But our pleasure out of a conversation, and our willingness to extend a conversation, depends on whether the participants not only allow each other space to advance their own opinion, but whether each interfaces with the submitted opinion. So we gain pleasure out of not only creating, but having others interact with our creations and experiencing others creations in turn.
Monday, November 10, 2014
Dialogue
When we enter a dialogue, we submit to each other a constructed,
self-contained body of logic for each-other to operate within. We are
encouraged to operate within a peer’s offered body of logic, and in a healthy
reciprocal conversation, we construct a new body of logic in turn for the other
person to consider and base their construction on, and so on. This can break
down when one of the conversationalists insists on maintaining their own
framework, though some frameworks can be better than others, and if both in the
dialogue recognize this, the conversation can move forward.
But our pleasure out of a conversation, and our willingness to extend a conversation, depends on whether the participants not only allow each other space to advance their own opinion, but whether each interfaces with the submitted opinion. So we gain pleasure out of not only creating, but having others interact with our creations and experiencing others creations in turn.
But our pleasure out of a conversation, and our willingness to extend a conversation, depends on whether the participants not only allow each other space to advance their own opinion, but whether each interfaces with the submitted opinion. So we gain pleasure out of not only creating, but having others interact with our creations and experiencing others creations in turn.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment