Each individual performs a function in accordance with what
he or she believes is right. What he or she believes is right is in the end,
something that he or she must simply do.
This is what could be referred to as destiny: simply the overriding impulse
above all other impulses to take a certain course of action, which has its
roots in the individual’s conception and development, whose roots extend into
environment and heredity and so on.
So as each individual performs a function, he or she
proceeds to either build something, help build something else, challenge what
is being built or even destroy something in the process. So we have ideologies,
anti-ideologies, and all sorts of alliances in between. All of these activities
end up producing various states of affairs that are based on ideologies, and
these states of affairs hold up if the ideologies are strong or appropriate to
the environment and represented by strong enough individuals and are not
challenged by strong enough individuals. And there are multiple ideologies, all
producing multiple states of affairs, with all of their adherents advocating
their own views and combating those that they disagree with. Whatever holds up
amid this tumult of human activity ends up being what is. This is aggregate human reality.
Is it that whatever survives persists because of blind luck?
Did it happen to be the strongest ideology that led to the most resilient
societies to subsist on the planet? Or is there something correct about these
ideologies, something harmonious, given the current constitution of not only
the planet but human social reality?
So what is to happen now? Well, all ideological systems
produce societies that in turn change the constitution of the very citizens
that are processed within their logic, so that in turn, a society is forced to
implement incremental changes along the way to conform to the topography, until
of course a major crisis forces the society to revise its very ideology, which
can create significant pressures.
No comments:
Post a Comment